Okada Manila Could Be Player in New York City Casino Competition

Okada Manila Could Be Player in New York City Casino Competition.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

When it wraps up its merger with a US-based special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), Okada Manila could enter the competition for a New York City casino license.

Okada ManilaThe Okada Manila integrated resort in the Philippines. The operator is rumored to be interested in a New York casino license. (Image: Forbes)

Sportico initially reported the rumor. In a deal valued at $2.6 billion, Jason Ader’s 26 Capital (NASDAQ:ADER) is acquiring Okada Manila. When that transaction closes, the gaming stock under the ticker “UERI” upon closure of the transaction.

That merger was originally slated to close last month. However, that was delayed after billionaire Kazuo Okada attempted to physically seize control of the Philippines integrated resort bearing his name. He claims he was unjustly ousted from the board in 2017. He is now looking to force the gaming company to adhere to a recent ruling by the Philippines Supreme Court, which ordered that the operator’s board be returned to its 2017 composition.

26 Capital with the merger. Universal Entertainment, the Japanese pachinko giant that’s the parent company of Okada Manila, is rolling in 100% of the equity in the casino operator, and Ader’s 26 Capital is providing up to $275 million in cash to the business.

How Okada Manila Fits in New York Scene

New York’s 2023 budget features a process to award downstate casino licenses. The New York metro area’s two gaming venues Resorts World New York City in Queens and MGM’s Empire City Casino in Yonkers — are currently limited to offering slots.

However, it’s expected that those properties will procure rights to convert to full, traditional casinos. That will  to vie for a single gaming permit.

Should Okada Manila pursue that opportunity, it will be entering the ring already rumored to be full of gaming industry heavyweights. Those include Hard Rock International, Las Vegas Sands and Wynn Resorts. Those are deep-pocketed companies with the brand recognition and reputations that are likely alluring to New York developers and policymakers.

Previously, Bally’s was rumored to be among the operators interested in a New York casino. Still, it’s unclear if that company’s in Chicago could temper its Big Apple ambitions.

Okada Manila Eyes Expansion

If Okada Manila were to list on the Nasdaq today, it’d be the smallest US-listed gaming company by number of properties, with just one item. Monarch Casino Resort (NASDAQ:MCRI) currently holds that distinction, as it owns two gaming venues.

Looking further out, it’s unlikely the standalone version of Okada Manila will remain a one-casino- company on a permanent basis. Last October, Ader said the operator could consider opportunities in regulated casino industry takes shape.

Owing to its established footprint in the Asia-Pacific region, Okada Manila could also be a player in new and expanding markets there. But it hasn’t commented to that effect beyond the aforementioned interest in Japan.

Article Sources
Oddest Gaming Stories of 2016: You Can’t Make This Stuff Up…And We Didn’t editorial policy.
  1. Full House Stock Comes Up Aces on Waukegan Win

Compare Accounts
×
Daily Fantasy Sports in 2016: A Year of Wins, Losses, and a Mega-Merger
Provider
Name
Description
Milwaukee Bucks on a Tear, Double-Digit Winning Streak in Jeopardy  San Antonio Spurs Owner Peter Holt Supports Texas Sports Betting  Singapore Casinos Singing the Blues as Gaming Loses to Shopping  Nevada Regulators Look to Extend Account Wagering Across the Casino Floor  Crown Resorts Sells $1.2 Billion Stake in Macau, Pulls Out of Alon Vegas Project  Fraudster Blows $1 Million on Game of War: Fire Age  MGM National Harbor Asks Non-Reservation Guests to Stay Away  Mississippi Gaming Chair Al Hopkins Dead, Backed Sports Betting  Bally’s Evicts Tribune Printing Plant from Future Chicago Casino Site  Philippines Gaming Regulator PAGCOR Claims Missing Casino Owner Not Paying His Fair Share of Taxes